2007 Cricket – Women's Test matches Cricket Records
Women's Test matches
Best bowling figures in an innings
Rank | Player | Overs | Mdns | Runs conceded | Wickets taken | Econ | Team | Innings in match | Opposition | Ground | Match Date | Scorecard |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
🥇 1 | S Loubser | 40.3 | 18 | 37 | 5 | 0.91 | SA Women | 2 | v NL Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
🥈 2 | JC Hartenhof | 24.0 | 5 | 62 | 4 | 2.58 | NL Women | 1 | v SA Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
🥉 3 | S Loubser | 14.0 | 4 | 22 | 3 | 1.57 | SA Women | 4 | v NL Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
🥉 3 | MEC de Fouw | 16.0 | 3 | 27 | 3 | 1.68 | NL Women | 1 | v SA Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
5 | SM Benade | 4.0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.25 | SA Women | 4 | v NL Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
5 | AE Smith | 6.0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0.66 | SA Women | 4 | v NL Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
5 | S Ismail | 5.0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1.00 | SA Women | 4 | v NL Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
5 | CS Terblanche | 14.0 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 0.78 | SA Women | 2 | v NL Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
5 | DM Braat | 2.3 | - | 11 | 2 | 4.40 | NL Women | 3 | v SA Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
10 | AE Smith | 20.0 | 12 | 14 | 1 | 0.70 | SA Women | 2 | v NL Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
10 | S Ismail | 20.0 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 0.75 | SA Women | 2 | v NL Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
10 | L Egging | 15.0 | 4 | 28 | 1 | 1.86 | NL Women | 1 | v SA Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
10 | M Kornet | 11.0 | - | 37 | 1 | 3.36 | NL Women | 1 | v SA Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
10 | AS Tanke | 10.0 | - | 39 | 1 | 3.90 | NL Women | 1 | v SA Women | Rotterdam | 28 Jul 2007 | Women's Test # 130 |
Showing 14 records
Additional Information
Performances in matches that overlap years are credited to the year in which they occurred - this results in some unknown data, especially in regard to bowling figures